The science fiction trilogy that set the stage for the cinematic transition into the new millennium

1999 gave us what it probably is One of the most influential films of the past quarter century. The transition into the new millennium on the big screen was marked by black trench coats, sunglasses, and philosophy for all audiences thanks to the cyberpunk show that the Wachowski sisters directed under the title “The Matrix.”

Going down the rabbit hole

At this point in the movie, there’s no need to claim this gem full of top-notch action, revolutionary special effects and a plot and a stage that screams “comedy” from the four winds, no super-inspired cast headed by some icons. Keanu Reeves, Carrie-Anne Moss, Laurence Fishburne and Hugo Weaving. Unfortunately, we can’t say the same for its two sequels.

And it is that the next two “The Matrix”, released as “Reloaded” and “Revolutions”, They received an unfairly harsh reception from one critic who did not agree with the drift the saga had taken.. Both sequels again sounded audiovisually flawless – let’s remember they were released in 2003 – but shaped their plot and dialogue enough that many dismissed them almost immediately.

Fortunately, the public received them more warmly. After the first The Matrix miracle, which was shot on a budget of about $60 million — the number of times mid-budget productions have had a place in cinemas — and collected 463, “Revolutions” and “Reloaded” collected $740 and $427 million After investments between 120 and 150 million respectively.

If you want to enjoy again many of the three virtues essential to understanding cinema in the early twentieth century, today you have a silver opportunity, not a golden one, since then Today it is broadcast by BeMad. The problem is First they show “Reloaded” and “Revolutions” – at 5:10pm and 7:50pm -, leaving the main course at 10:00pm., when you can see the first “Matrix”. And remember, there is no spoon.

In Espinov | The best science fiction and fantasy films of 2023