A puzzle was created by the owner of the address 10 days after Bitcoin was born

A Bitcoin customer claimed, on November 27, to be the owner of the private keys to one of the first Bitcoin addresses.

This is the address of a person who was a miner and on January 19, 2009 (just 10 days after the birth of Bitcoin) received 50 Bitcoins (BTC) as a reward for his activity.

In the bitcointalk forum society asked If only they could share their oldest Bitcoin addresses. This user is identified as one signatureshare an encrypted message using a private key that corresponds to a file public address January 2009.

The user in question remains anonymous and, according to forum data, is a new account with very little activity. Address is empty, no money.

Comes to light this title of the times that Satoshi Nakamoto She was active, she made a fuss. Some users have begun to speculate that the address may have belonged to the creator of Bitcoin or those who were involved in mining on the network. however, Some questioned the authenticity of the message encoded by OneSignature, So the user is back To participate Another letter confirming possession of the original address on 28 November.

The title will be associated with Hal Finney

according to number of questions When this movement was in full swing, forum users took to the task of investigating a possible origin. in screenshot Shared in the forum, corresponding to the portfolio Hal FinneyAnd the The first user to receive a bitcoin transaction died in 2014you can see that there is a relationship with the claimed address.

Having received the money in 2009, they “slept” until 2011, the year they were Transferalong with another 2,000 BTC, to a single address.

When sending Bitcoin money, the protocol allows funds from different addresses to be used to send them to a single address. This is as long as you have the private keys

See also  Fill in the blanks with ads

Advertising

The list shows that some of the entries in the Transactionmatches one of them addresses Which is identified as belonging to Finney and another to User OneSignature. Therefore, it is expected that the user will be able to access the rest of the private keys in the list, possibly to Finney’s bitcoins.